SEC Questions ETH and SOL Staking ETF Status

The SEC says ETH and SOL staking products may not qualify as ETFs due to structural and disclosure concerns.

  • SEC challenges ETH and SOL staking ETF classification
  • REX and Osprey Funds face scrutiny over structure
  • Uncertainty grows around staking ETF approval timeline

SEC Casts Doubt on ETH and SOL Staking ETF Plans

Just days after optimism surged over Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL) staking ETFs, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has poured cold water on the idea. According to the latest update, the agency is raising concerns that staking-based products from REX Financial and Osprey Funds may not qualify as true ETFs under federal securities laws.

The SEC is reportedly questioning both the structural setup and disclosure practices of these products, casting doubt on whether they meet the legal standards to be approved as exchange-traded funds.

Key Issues: Structure and Transparency

While the staking ETF proposals had generated excitement, the SEC appears focused on two main concerns:

  • Product Structure: The agency is unsure whether these funds are designed like traditional ETFs, which require specific liquidity, redemption, and pricing mechanisms.
  • Disclosure Standards: Regulators are also probing whether the funds adequately explain staking mechanics, associated risks, and how staking rewards will be handled.

This puts pressure on fund issuers like REX and Osprey to revise their filings or reclassify their offerings into a different type of investment vehicle, such as trusts or closed-end funds.

Implications for the Crypto Market

This latest development may delay or derail what many saw as a potential turning point for staking adoption in traditional finance. If the SEC refuses to recognize these products as ETFs, other firms may either withdraw their applications or pursue alternative structures, potentially slowing institutional exposure to staking rewards.

Still, the situation remains fluid. Issuers could address the SEC’s concerns through amended filings, keeping the door open for future approval—though likely under tighter regulatory guidelines.

Read Also:

Disclaimer: The content on CoinoMedia is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry risks, and readers should conduct their own research before making any decisions. CoinoMedia is not responsible for any losses or actions taken based on the information provided.

Isolde Verne

Isolde Verne is a passionate crypto writer, focusing on blockchain innovation, NFT ecosystems, and the societal impact of decentralized systems. Her engaging style bridges the gap between technology and everyday understanding.

Related Articles

Back to top button